OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Karla C. Ellis, Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Karla C. Ellis
Respondent
State of Missouri

Disposition

Undetermined

Procedural posture: unknown

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

3

onto using a paddle. Ellis told Sergeant she used the paddle the last time she had spanked Child. Ellis denied seeing any bruising from that spanking. When Sergeant asked Ellis whether anyone else might have put the bruises on Child, Ellis suggested that maybe Grandmother could have done so or that Child could have fallen. While at Ellis's home, Sergeant saw the belt and paddle sitting on the kitchen table. Both the belt and paddle had the children's names written on them. The belt was leather and in two pieces. The paddle was a rough plank of wood. When asked about the children's names on the belt and paddle, Ellis told Sergeant "it was so that they knew what it was for." Both the belt and paddle were photographed and taken into evidence. Based on the photographs, physical evidence, and statements, Sergeant determined Child's bruises were caused by the belt and paddle. Sergeant further found that the extent and nature of the bruising would have caused Child pain and indicated child abuse. The State charged Ellis with the class D felony of abuse or neglect of a child, Section 568.060, 1 alleging that in March 2020, Ellis knowingly caused Child to suffer physical injury as a result of abuse by hitting the child with a belt and paddle causing bruising to the child's back and buttocks. The case proceeded to trial, where Ellis testified in her own defense. Ellis denied causing Child's bruising. Ellis testified that she spanked her children regularly with her hand and that there had never been any bruising. The last time Ellis recalled spanking Child was when he "had picked up a decently heavy toy and was getting ready to throw it at [Sister's] head." Ellis was shown the first photograph showing Child's bruising. Ellis agreed that the extent and nature of the bruising appeared to show serious physical injury to Child. When

1 All Section references are to RSMo (2016).

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McGregory, Appellant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMarch 10, 2026#ED113080

affirmed

McGregory appealed his convictions for domestic assault in the third degree and property damage in the second degree, raising unpreserved claims of error regarding evidence admissibility and the Crime Victims' Compensation Fund judgment amount. The court affirmed the convictions but modified the CVC judgment amount, finding the trial court entered a judgment in excess of that authorized by law.

criminal-lawper_curiam3,374 words

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. James Willis Peters, Appellant.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101218

remanded

James Willis Peters appealed his conviction for driving while intoxicated as a chronic offender, challenging whether the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all four of his prior offenses were intoxication-related traffic offenses. The court found the state failed to sufficiently prove his 2002 offense was an IRTO and therefore vacated the judgment and remanded for resentencing.

criminal-lawper_curiam3,993 words

Billy Wagner, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.(2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 16, 2025#ED113083

affirmed
criminal-lawmajority3,603 words

Barry E. Anderson, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 2, 2025#ED113203

affirmed
criminal-lawmajority2,271 words

David O. Love, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictNovember 12, 2025#ED113032

affirmed
criminal-lawmajority4,295 words

State of Missouri vs. Howard Kristopher Moots(2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#WD86942

affirmed
criminal-lawmajority651 words