OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Larry Lumley, Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Larry Lumley, Appellant. Case Number: No. 71081 Handdown Date: 06/17/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Philip J. Sweeney Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Before Crane, P.J. and Smith and Pudlowski, JJ. Opinion:

Defendant appeals from a judgment by the court finding him guilty of forgery, section 570.090.1(4) RSMo 1994 and sentencing him to three years imprisonment. Defendant's brief preserves nothing for appeal because his points relied on do not state wherein and why the trial court erred. However, we have reviewed the record and we find no error of law. The verdict of the court was supported by the evidence. The complaint which initially charged defendant was not deficient and was followed by indictment. Defendant's waiver of a jury trial was voluntary and the case was voluntarily submitted to the court on police reports and exhibits only. No precedential value would be served by an extended opinion. Judgment of conviction affirmed. Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions