State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Larry Moses, Appellant and Larry Moses, Movant-Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Larry Moses·Larry Moses, Appellant and Larry Moses, Movant-Appellant, v. State of Missouri
- Respondent
- State of Missouri
Disposition
Affirmed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Larry Moses, Appellant and Larry Moses, Movant-Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 68968 & 72606 Handdown Date: 05/12/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. James R. Hartenbach Counsel for Appellant: Richard H. Sindel Counsel for Respondent: Gregory L. Barnes Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr. and Karohl, J.J. concur. Opinion: ORDER Defendant appeals after conviction and sentence on charges of murder in the first degree and armed criminal action. He also appeals denial of Rule 29.15 post conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. In review of the issues on direct appeal we find no error of fact or law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. On the post conviction relief appeal we find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, the findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, no error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value. The sentences and denial of post conviction relief are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion:
None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Rules
- Rule 29.15cited
Rule 29.15
- Rule 30.25cited
Rule 30.25
- Rule 84.16cited
Rule 84.16
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Julian McClain, Defendant/Appellant. Julian McClain, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Lisa Zych, Movant v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2002)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District#ED79487
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Ralph Harper, Defendant/Appellant and Ralph Harper, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Marques Morris, Defendant. Maarques Morris, Movant/Defendant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stanley Burks, Appellant. Stanley Burks, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. George Ferina, Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District