OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael Lyle, Defendant/Appellant. Michael Lyle, Defendant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael Lyle, Defendant/Appellant. Michael Lyle, Defendant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: Nos. 68426 & 70947 Handdown Date: 06/27/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Daniel J. O'Toole Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: Before: Mary Rhodes Russell, P.J., Paul J. Simon, J., and Kent E. Karohl, J. Opinion:

ORDER Michael Lyle appeals from his conviction of two counts of attempted rape, in violation of Section 566.030 RSMo 1994; and three counts of sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060 RSMo 1994, with a nine year-old female. He argues improper admission of evidence of uncharged misconduct, inappropriate comment by the prosecutor in closing argument, and preclusion of his presentation of evidence and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without entering findings of fact and conclusions of law. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties

involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding. Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions