State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tony L. Crews, Appellant.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Tony L. Crews
- Respondent
- State of Missouri
Disposition
Affirmed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tony L. Crews, Appellant. Case Number: 52579 and 54254 and 54280 Handdown Date: 02/17/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Boone County, Hon. Frank Conley Counsel for Appellant: Ellen H. Flottman Counsel for Respondent: Angel M. Woodruff Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Spinden, P.J., Stith and Smith, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Appellant Tony L. Crews appeals his convictions for trafficking in the second degree and resisting arrest, claiming that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of uncharged crimes. Mr. Crews failed to preserve this point for review by objecting at trial, and we find no plain error on the facts of this case. Mr. Crews also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing, claiming that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to file a motion to disclose the identity of a confidential informant. Assuming trial counsel erred in failing to do so, the facts in this case show that this error could not have affected the outcome of the case. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order and have supplied the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Rules
- Rule 29.15cited
Rule 29.15
- Rule 30.25cited
Rule 30.25
- Rule 84.16cited
Rule 84.16
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Julian McClain, Defendant/Appellant. Julian McClain, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Lisa Zych, Movant v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2002)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District#ED79487
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Ralph Harper, Defendant/Appellant and Ralph Harper, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Marques Morris, Defendant. Maarques Morris, Movant/Defendant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stanley Burks, Appellant. Stanley Burks, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. George Ferina, Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District