State of Missouri vs. James Raulerson
Decision date: UnknownWD78556
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v.
JAMES RAULERSON, Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) )
WD78556
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY THE HONORABLE JANET L. SUTTON, JUDGE
BEFORE DIVISION TWO: CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, PRESIDING JUDGE, LISA WHITE HARDWICK AND ALOK AHUJA, JUDGES
James Raulerson was convicted of first-degree child molestation and sentenced to a term of 20 years in prison. On June 27, 2017, we affirmed his conviction but vacated his sentence and remanded the case to the circuit court for resentencing. The State subsequently filed a motion in this court for rehearing or transfer to the Supreme Court. On July 26, 2017, Raulerson's counsel informed this court that Raulerson had died on July 23, 2017, and she asked us to stay our ruling on the State's motion for rehearing or transfer until after she obtained a death certificate confirming Raulerson's death. We granted the stay. On October 24, 2017, Raulerson's counsel filed a copy of his death certificate along with a
2
motion to lift the stay and remand the case to the circuit court with instructions to dismiss the underlying criminal case. The stay is lifted. Because Raulerson died while his appeal was still pending, he was never finally convicted of the charged crime of first-degree child molestation during his lifetime, and his death served to abate the prosecution against him. State v. Macklin, 560 S.W.2d 69, 70 (Mo. App. 1977); State v. Benitez, 412 S.W.3d 451, 452 (Mo. App. 2013). Therefore, we withdraw our opinion, filed on June 27, 2017, and remand this case to the circuit court with directions to dismiss the underlying criminal case.
____________________________________ LISA WHITE HARDWICK, JUDGE
ALL CONCUR.
Related Opinions
Rodney Lee Lincoln, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2014)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 2, 2104#ED100987
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McGregory, Appellant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMarch 10, 2026#ED113080
McGregory appealed his convictions for domestic assault in the third degree and property damage in the second degree, raising unpreserved claims of error regarding evidence admissibility and the Crime Victims' Compensation Fund judgment amount. The court affirmed the convictions but modified the CVC judgment amount, finding the trial court entered a judgment in excess of that authorized by law.
STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. RUSSELL KENNETH CLANCY, Appellant(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictFebruary 25, 2026#SD38782
The court affirmed Clancy's conviction for second-degree assault against a special victim after a jury trial. The evidence was sufficient to prove that Clancy punched an elderly civilian in the face and struck a police officer during an altercation at a laundromat, supporting the conviction under Missouri statute § 565.052.3.
State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. James Willis Peters, Appellant.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101218
James Willis Peters appealed his conviction for driving while intoxicated as a chronic offender, challenging whether the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all four of his prior offenses were intoxication-related traffic offenses. The court found the state failed to sufficiently prove his 2002 offense was an IRTO and therefore vacated the judgment and remanded for resentencing.
State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Deandre D. Walton, Appellant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 17, 2026#ED112976
Appellant Deandre Walton appealed his convictions for two counts of first-degree murder, two counts of armed criminal action, and unlawful possession of a firearm, arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements and admitting evidence of his statements at trial. The appellate court affirmed the convictions, finding no error in the trial court's denial of the suppression motion.