Steven D. Parrish and El Tovar Incorporated, Appellants v. Presbytery of Giddings-Lovejoy, Inc., Steven J. Conway, Alderman and City of St. Louis Board of Public Service, Respondents.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Steven D. Parrish and El Tovar Incorporated, Appellants v. Presbytery of Giddings-Lovejoy, Inc., Steven J. Conway, Alderman and City of St. Louis Board of Public Service, Respondents. Case Number: ED86699 Handdown Date: 06/13/2006 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. David L. Dowd Counsel for Appellant: Steven D. Parrish, Pro Se Counsel for Respondent: Paul F. Devine, Patricia A. Hageman, Edward J. Hanlon and Maribeth McMahon Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: DISMISSED. Gaertner, Sr., P.J., Draper, III, and Romines, J.J. Opinion: Opinion modified by Court's own motion on June 13, 2006. This substitution does not constitute a new opinion. Appellants, Steven D. Parrish and El Tovar Incorporated, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying their request for a preliminary injunction. We only have jurisdiction over final judgments that dispose of all parties and issues in the case. Hair Kraz, Inc. v. Schuchardt, 131 S.W.3d 854, 854 (Mo.App.E.D. 2004). Generally, an appeal will not lie from the denial of a preliminary injunction. Id. The trial court's amended judgment denied Appellants' request for a preliminary injunction, but there was no denial or grant of a request for a permanent injunction within the amended judgment. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal

for lack of jurisdiction. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.