Timothy K. Becklean, Petitioner-Appellant, Director of Revenue, Respondent-Respondent.
Decision date: Unknown
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Case Style: Timothy K. Becklean, Petitioner-Appellant, Director of Revenue, Respondent-Respondent. Case Number: 21772 Handdown Date: 03/02/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Laclede County, Hon. Cody A. Hanna Counsel for Appellant: Eric Hutson Counsel for Respondent: Evan J. Buchheim Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: James K. Prewitt, Judge Opinion Vote: DISMISSED. Garrison, P.J., and Crow, J., concur. Opinion: APPEAL DISMISSED Appellant filed a petition contesting the revocation of his driver's license for refusal to submit to a chemical test of his blood-alcohol content. The matter was tried on June 4, 1997, and taken under advisement until the following day. On June 5, 1997, the docket sheet shows the following: The appeal was taken from this writing. There is no other entry in the record which purports to be a judgment or other final determination of the trial court. For an entry to be a judgment under Rule 74.01(a), it must be denominated as a judgment, although not necessarily at the top of the writing. Brooks v. Director of Revenue, 954 S.W.2d 715 (Mo.App. 1997). See also City of St. Louis v. Hughes, 950 S.W.2d 850 (Mo. banc 1997). Absent a judgment, this Court does not have jurisdiction and must dismiss the appeal. Brooks, supra. The appeal is dismissed. Separate Opinion:
None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
In re: Brian Todd Goldstein, Respondent.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 23, 2026#SC101182
The Missouri Supreme Court found that attorney Brian Todd Goldstein violated professional conduct rules by mishandling client funds and engaging in dishonest conduct, including taking clients without informing his law firm, misrepresenting trust account practices, and misappropriating over $585,000 from more than 100 clients. The Court ordered Goldstein disbarred based on violations of rules governing safekeeping of property and dishonest conduct.
In re: Mark W. Arensberg, Respondent.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 13, 2026#SC101157
Attorney Arensberg was disciplined for knowingly drafting fraudulent loan documents to diminish a client's son's marital estate during divorce proceedings. Rather than the agreed-upon reprimand, the court imposed an indefinite suspension with a six-month waiting period for reinstatement, stayed pending successful completion of one-year probation.
Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services vs. Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#WD87223
Motors Insurance Corporation vs. Autobot Towing, LLC(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictJuly 8, 2025#WD87590
JAMES SANCHEZ, in his capacity as President of INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 702, KEITH ATCHISON, in his capacity as Vice-President of INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 702, and QUINTON TILLMAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. CITY OF POPLAR BLUFF, MISSOURI, Defendant-Respondent(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictMay 28, 2025#SD38656