West Publishing Corporation, Respondent, v. Daniel D. Phillips, Appellant.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: West Publishing Corporation, Respondent, v. Daniel D. Phillips, Appellant. Case Number: WD58006 Handdown Date: 11/14/2000 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. Anthony J. Romano Counsel for Appellant: Ronald K. Barker Counsel for Respondent: Linda S. Tarpley Opinion Summary: Daniel Phillips appeals the default judgment against him and in favor of West Publishing Corporation on West Publishing's petition on account. Mr. Phillips argues that he was never properly served because the summons and petition were left at his former residence with a non-family member who was under the age of 15 at the time, contrary to the requirements of Rule 54.13(b)(1). Mr. Phillips raised his claim of defective service in a motion to quash summons and personal service, which the court denied prior to entering the default judgment against him. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Division I holds: The trial court erred in denying Mr. Phillips' motion to quash the purported service of process and in entering the default judgment against him. West Publishing concedes it never obtained proper service upon Mr. Phillips. When the requirements for service of process are not met, the trial court lacks personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Without personal jurisdiction over the defendant, a personal judgment rendered against the defendant is void. Citation: Opinion Author: Patricia Breckenridge, Judge Opinion Vote: REVERSED AND REMANDED. Ulrich and Howard, JJ., concur. Opinion: Daniel Phillips appeals the default judgment against him and in favor of West Publishing Corporation on West

Publishing's petition on account. The trial court awarded West Publishing $40,376.15 plus costs. Mr. Phillips claims that the trial court erred in entering judgment against him because the court did not have personal jurisdiction. Specifically, Mr. Phillips argues that he was never properly served because the summons and petition were left at his former residence with a non-family member who was under the age of 15 at the time, contrary to the requirements of Rule 54.13(b)(1). Mr. Phillips raised his claim of defective service in a motion to quash summons and personal service, which the court denied prior to entering the default judgment against him. "'When the requirements for manner of service are not met, a court lacks power to adjudicate.'" Worley v. Worley, 19 S.W.3d 127, 129 (Mo. banc 2000) (quoting State ex rel. Plaster v. Pinnell, 831 S.W.2d 949, 951 (Mo. App. 1992)). Without personal jurisdiction over the defendant, a personal judgment rendered against the defendant is void. Worley, 19 S.W.3d at 130. West Publishing did not file a respondent's brief in this case. Instead, West Publishing sent a letter to this court in which it conceded that proper service was never obtained upon Mr. Phillips, and that the entry of the default judgment was improper. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded, and the trial court is directed to quash the purported service of process and set aside its November 3, 1999, default judgment against Mr. Phillips. All concur. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.