Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

39 Bell, LLC Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
39-bell-llc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving 39 Bell, LLC

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Oct 8, 2019

39 Bell, LLC vs. K&K, Inc., et al

Appellant

K&K, Inc., M&L&J, Inc., and Mia Jamison appealed the circuit court's judgment enforcing a settlement agreement for the sale of real estate. Appellants argued that there was no sworn testimony to support the settlement and that the finding of a binding agreement was against the weight of the evidence due to a lack of attorney authority. The appellate court affirmed, holding that sworn testimony is not required to establish a settlement agreement when an attorney of record asserts authority, and that the appellants failed to overcome the presumption of their attorney's authority to settle.