Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

4021 Iowa, LLC Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
4021-iowa-llc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving 4021 Iowa, LLC

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Jan 21, 2025

4021 Iowa, LLC, Respondent, vs. K&A Delmar Property, LLC, et al., Appellant.

Respondent

K&A Delmar Property, LLC (Appellants) appealed the circuit court's reinstatement of a default judgment in favor of 4021 Iowa, LLC (Iowa), which arose from a breach of contract dispute. The circuit court had previously set aside the default judgment, but the appellate court reversed that decision and remanded for reinstatement. On this appeal, Appellants challenged the circuit court's jurisdiction to award damages exceeding the pleadings, the sufficiency of evidence for attorneys' fees, and the post-judgment interest accrual date. The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment, denying all three points on appeal.