Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

ADB Companies, Inc. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
adb-companies-inc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving ADB Companies, Inc.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Feb 9, 2021

ADB Companies, Inc. vs. Socket Telecom, LLC

Appellant

Socket Telecom, LLC appealed a judgment from a bench trial in favor of ADB Companies, Inc. on ADB's breach of contract claim. The trial court found Socket breached the contract by improperly withholding funds and awarded ADB attorney's fees and prejudgment interest. The appellate court reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment for Socket, holding that ADB failed to follow the contract's clear written procedure for requesting time extensions, thus not entitling it to an extension or the associated damages and fees.