Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

ALLEN K. HOGAN Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
allen-k-hogan
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving ALLEN K. HOGAN

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Oct 28, 2020

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent vs. ALLEN K. HOGAN, Appellant

Appellant

Allen K. Hogan was convicted of second-degree sodomy and appealed his judgment of conviction. He challenged the trial court's exclusion of an exhibit and a clerical error in the written judgment that incorrectly listed the offense as first-degree sodomy. The appellate court dismissed Hogan's first point under the escape rule due to his failure to appear for sentencing. It granted his second point, remanding the case for correction of the written judgment to reflect the oral pronouncement of second-degree sodomy, and affirmed the judgment of conviction in all other respects.