Alvin Brockington, Individually and On Behalf of All Similarly-Situated Missouri Cases
This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Alvin Brockington, on behalf of a class of employees, sued New Horizons Enterprises, LLC, alleging violations of the Missouri Prevailing Wage Act for work performed on properties in Kansas City. The circuit court granted summary judgment for New Horizons, which the court of appeals affirmed. The Missouri Supreme Court reversed the summary judgment and remanded the case, finding a genuine dispute of material fact regarding whether the employees were employed "on behalf of any public body engaged in the construction" within the meaning of the Act.
Alvin Brockington, on behalf of similarly-situated individuals, appealed the circuit court's grant of summary judgment to New Horizons Enterprises, LLC. Brockington alleged that New Horizons violated the Missouri Prevailing Wage Act and Minimum Wage Law by not paying prevailing wages for work on the "Commonwealth Project," contending the project was performed "on behalf of" a public body. The appellate court affirmed the summary judgment, concluding that the public body was not sufficiently "engaged in" the construction for the Prevailing Wage Act to apply to New Horizons' workers.