Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
amco-insurance-company
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Insurance Bad Faith
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / May 1, 2023

COURTNEY GARNER, Respondent v. AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

Appellant

Courtney Garner sued AMCO Insurance Company for underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits after her son was killed in an accident with a Silverado. The Silverado's owner had a $500,000 liability policy, while Garner's AMCO policy had a UIM bodily injury limit of $50,000 per person. The trial court granted summary judgment for Garner, finding her entitled to UIM coverage. The appellate court reversed and remanded with instructions to enter summary judgment for AMCO, holding that the Silverado was not an "underinsured motor vehicle" under the unambiguous terms of the AMCO policy because its liability limit was not less than AMCO's UIM limit.