Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Andrew Barnett Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
andrew-barnett
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Andrew Barnett

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Andrew Barnett was convicted of first-degree assault and armed criminal action following a jury trial. He appealed, arguing the circuit court erred by refusing to submit a self-defense instruction, despite his denial of the stabbing. The Missouri Supreme Court vacated the judgment and remanded the case, holding that a self-defense instruction must be given if substantial evidence supports it, regardless of whether the defendant's own testimony contradicts that theory. The Court clarified and overruled prior cases that had created an exception based on the source or consistency of the evidence.