Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Anne Precythe, Et AL Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
anne-precythe-et-al
Cases Shown
3
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Cases Involving Anne Precythe, Et AL

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Oct 19, 2021

Keith E. Walker vs. Anne Precythe, et al.

Respondent

Keith Walker, an incarcerated person, appealed the dismissal of his "Whistle Blower Complaint" against the Missouri Department of Corrections and its officials, which alleged misappropriation of funds for winter clothing and medicine. The trial court had dismissed his petition for failure to state a claim. The appellate court dismissed Walker's appeal, finding that his brief failed to substantially comply with Rule 84.04's mandatory briefing requirements, thereby preserving nothing for review.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Oct 27, 2020

Fredrico Lowe Bey vs. Anne Precythe, et al

Respondent

Fredrico Lowe Bey appealed the dismissal of his petition alleging Missouri Merchandising Practices Act violations against the Missouri Department of Corrections and its Director. The circuit court had dismissed Bey's petition for failure to state a claim. The appellate court dismissed Bey's appeal due to significant deficiencies in his appellate brief, specifically non-compliance with Rule 84.04 regarding points relied on and statement of facts, which prevented a meaningful review of his claims.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Nov 5, 2019

Fredrico Lowe Bey vs. Anne Precythe, Et AL

Respondent

Fredrico Lowe Bey appealed the circuit court's denial of his petition for trial de novo, which followed the dismissal of his small claims complaint against the Missouri Department of Corrections and its director. The circuit court denied the petition for trial de novo as untimely, citing a failure to include a correctional center account statement or filing fees. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that neither the relevant statutes nor rules impose such requirements as jurisdictional prerequisites for perfecting a trial de novo application, and Bey was not required to reapply for in forma pauperis status.