Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Antoinette Taylor Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
antoinette-taylor
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Antoinette Taylor

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Mar 5, 2019

Midtown Home Improvements, Inc., Respondent, vs. Antoinette Taylor, Appellant.

Appellant

Antoinette Taylor appealed pro se from a trial court judgment in favor of Midtown Home Improvements, Inc., for the balance due on a home exterior work contract. The appellate court dismissed Taylor's appeal, finding her brief substantially failed to comply with Rule 84.04 of the Missouri Rules of Appellate Procedure, thus preserving no claims for review. The court also granted Midtown's motion for attorney's fees incurred on appeal, as authorized by the contract between the parties.