Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

A.S. and A.S. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
as-and-as
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving A.S. and A.S.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

A.S. and A.S., the child's aunt and uncle, appealed the overruling of their motion for new trial following an adjudication hearing on a child neglect petition. The child had been removed from their temporary custody after suffering burns and fractures. The Missouri Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the relatives lacked standing under section 211.261 of the Juvenile Code. The Court found they were not appealing on the child's behalf and did not qualify as "parents" because their adoption of the child was not finalized.

A.S. and A.S., the child's aunt and uncle, appealed a juvenile court judgment that assumed jurisdiction over L.N.G.S. and placed the child in Children's Division care, arguing the court erred in denying their motion to continue the adjudication hearing. The appellate court determined that the relatives lacked statutory authority to appeal under section 211.261, as they are not defined as parents and did not appeal on the child's behalf. However, recognizing a significant split of authority among intermediate appellate courts regarding whether section 512.020 confers appeal rights to otherwise excluded parties, the court transferred the case to the Supreme Court of Missouri for final disposition to reexamine existing law.