Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Atain Specialty Insurance Company Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
atain-specialty-insurance-company
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Insurance Bad Faith
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Atain Specialty Insurance Company

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jun 18, 2019

Franklin D. Allen vs. Atain Specialty Insurance Company

Respondent

Appellant Franklin D. Allen appealed the circuit court's denial of his motion to set a trial date for bad faith claims against Atain Specialty Insurance Company. Allen had previously secured a $16 million judgment against an insured, Bryers, whom Atain refused to defend. The Supreme Court had modified a prior garnishment judgment against Atain to $1 million (policy limits) plus interest, explicitly stating no bad faith finding was made. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the Supreme Court's specific mandate on remand precluded the circuit court from addressing Allen's bad faith claims, as those issues were considered resolved within the traditional garnishment action.