Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Barry L. Nolan Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
barry-l-nolan
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Barry L. Nolan

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Apr 19, 2022

George R. Wagner, et al. vs. Barry L. Nolan

Respondent

George and Lila Wagner appealed the trial court's judgment granting Barry Nolan relief from a prior injunction that prevented him from operating a tow business from his residential property, which violated subdivision restrictive covenants. Nolan claimed the covenants were terminated by a majority vote of lot owners. The appellate court reversed, holding that the trial court erred in counting replatted lots as separate voting tracts, which resulted in an incorrect determination that a majority had voted to terminate the covenants.