Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Benjamin Metzger, by and Through His Friend and Natural Mother, Kathryn Metzger Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
benjamin-metzger-by-and-through-his-friend-and-natural-mother-kathryn-metzger
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Insurance Bad Faith
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Benjamin Metzger, by and Through His Friend and Natural Mother, Kathryn Metzger

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Benjamin Metzger, through his mother, obtained a default judgment of $900,000 against United Services Automobile Association (USAA) for underinsured motorist coverage. USAA moved to set aside the default judgment, arguing improper service, lack of personal jurisdiction, due process violations, and that the judgment improperly stacked policy limits and lacked evidentiary support for damages. The appellate court affirmed the denial of USAA's motion, holding that USAA failed to provide evidence to support its claims of improper service and that its other arguments were unpreserved merits defenses not cognizable under Rule 74.06(b)(4).