Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, Movant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
billie-j-borschnack-movant
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Cases Involving BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, Movant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Oct 29, 2020

BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, Movant-Appellant vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent

Appellant

Billie J. Borschnack appealed the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, arguing that appointed counsel abandoned him, which would make his retained counsel's subsequent amended motion timely. The motion court found no abandonment because the public defender's office was never effectively notified of the appointment. The appellate court affirmed the motion court's judgment, holding that without effective notice, there was no abandonment by appointed counsel, and thus the retained counsel's amended motion was untimely. Consequently, Borschnack's initial pro se motion, which contained only a conclusory allegation, was properly denied.