Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Boston Scientific Corporation and C.R. Bard, Inc. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
boston-scientific-corporation-and-cr-bard-inc
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Boston Scientific Corporation and C.R. Bard, Inc.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Eve Sherrer sued Boston Scientific Corporation and C.R. Bard Inc. for negligence, product defect, and failure to warn after polypropylene mesh slings were surgically implanted. Following a jury verdict for the defendants, Sherrer appealed, claiming errors in evidence exclusion and denial of a mistrial. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the judgment, holding that corporate prior convictions are not admissible for impeachment under section 491.050, and while using abandoned pleadings as admissions is improper, the error was not prejudicial due to cumulative evidence. The Court also found no manifest abuse of discretion in denying a mistrial after settlement information was briefly displayed, as prejudice was not established.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Aug 21, 2018

Eve Sherrer vs. Boston Scientific Corporation and C.R. Bard, Inc.

Respondent

Eve Sherrer sued Boston Scientific Corporation and C.R. Bard, Inc. in a products liability action concerning mesh slings. The trial court entered judgment in favor of both defendants following jury verdicts. On appeal, the Western District reversed the judgment against Bard and remanded for a new trial, holding that the trial court committed reversible error by excluding evidence of Bard's prior felony convictions for impeachment purposes. The judgment in favor of Boston Scientific was affirmed.