Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

BRANDON W. STARK, Movant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
brandon-w-stark-movant
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving BRANDON W. STARK, Movant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Jun 7, 2018

BRANDON W. STARK, Movant-Respondent, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Appellant.

Respondent

Brandon W. Stark filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after pleading guilty to multiple charges, including felonies and misdemeanors, and receiving consecutive sentences. The motion court granted relief, finding his guilty plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary due to an involuntary waiver of counsel. On appeal, the State challenged the motion court's findings and its authority to grant relief for misdemeanors. The appellate court affirmed the motion court's judgment, concluding that Stark's waiver of counsel was involuntary and the State's challenge to the misdemeanor relief was unpreserved.