Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Christopher Lamar Jones Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
christopher-lamar-jones
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Christopher Lamar Jones

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Nov 9, 2021

State of Missouri vs. Christopher Lamar Jones

Respondent

Christopher Jones appealed his convictions for second-degree murder, armed criminal action, and tampering with physical evidence. He raised five points, including a constitutional challenge to a statute prohibiting appeal bonds, a claim of wrongful pretrial detention, and challenges to the admission of prior bad acts evidence and the prosecutor's closing argument. The Western District of the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed all convictions, finding no error. The court held that the constitutional challenge was merely colorable, the detention claim was waived, and the evidentiary and closing argument claims lacked merit or were unpreserved.