Missouri Case Party

City of Clinton Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: city-of-clinton
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Employment Law

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Employment Law Workers' Compensation Civil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving City of Clinton

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / May 30, 2023

City of Clinton vs. Robert Dahman

Appellant

Robert Dahman, a former police officer for the City of Clinton, sought workers' compensation benefits for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after responding to the fatal shooting of a fellow officer. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission awarded him benefits, finding his PTSD was a compensable occupational disease caused by "extraordinary and unusual" work-related stress. The City appealed, arguing Dahman failed to meet the statutory requirement. The appellate court affirmed the Commission's award, concluding that sufficient competent evidence supported the finding that Dahman's work-related stress was extraordinary and unusual by objective standards.

Employment Law Workers' Compensation Civil Litigation