Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

City of Kansas City, Missouri, Finance Department, Revenue Division Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
city-of-kansas-city-missouri-finance-department-revenue-division
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving City of Kansas City, Missouri, Finance Department, Revenue Division

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

Ventas, Inc. vs. City of Kansas City, Missouri, Finance Department, Revenue Division

Respondent

Ventas, Inc., a real estate investment trust (REIT), appealed the circuit court's grant of summary judgment to the City of Kansas City, Missouri, regarding earnings and profits tax assessments. Ventas contended its rental income was not subject to the City's earnings tax and that its federally required dividend paid deductions were deductible expenses. The appellate court affirmed that Ventas's rental income is a business activity subject to the earnings tax and that its dividend deductions are not deductible expenses. However, the court reversed the summary judgment on assessed penalties, finding material facts in dispute regarding reasonable cause for waiver, and remanded for further proceedings on that issue.