Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Clayton H. White Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
clayton-h-white
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Clayton H. White

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Nov 3, 2020

Sally A. White, Respondent, vs. Clayton H. White, Appellant.

Appellant

Clayton White (Father) appealed the trial court's judgment dissolving his marriage to Sally White (Mother), challenging the awards of joint legal custody, "primary" physical custody to Mother, and the visitation schedule for their oldest child, S.W. The appellate court affirmed the joint legal custody award, finding it supported by substantial evidence. It modified the "primary" physical custody designation to "sole" physical custody, as "primary" is not statutorily recognized. The court reversed and remanded the visitation schedule for S.W., holding that the trial court improperly delegated its authority to a counselor and failed to specifically detail visitation rights as required by statute.