Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Cordell Nichols, Jr. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
cordell-nichols-jr
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Cordell Nichols, Jr.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Dec 14, 2021

Cordell Nichols, Jr., Appellant, vs. Thomas McCarthy, Respondent.

Appellant

Cordell Nichols, Jr. appealed a declaratory judgment in favor of Judge Thomas McCarthy, seeking a declaration that Missouri Supreme Court Rule 33.01(c) requires consideration of a defendant's ability to pay when setting monetary conditions of release in an initial arrest warrant. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment. It held that Rules 22.04 and 33.01 require courts to rely only on "available information" when setting bond in an initial warrant, and this generally does not include ability-to-pay information. The court further held that the rules do not impose an obligation on police, prosecutors, or courts to investigate a defendant's financial resources before an initial arrest warrant is issued.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Sep 22, 2020

Cordell Nichols, Jr., Appellant, vs. Thomas McCarthy, Respondent.

Appellant

Cordell Nichols, Jr. appealed the dismissal of his petition for declaratory judgment, which sought a declaration that the circuit court must consider a defendant's ability to pay when setting monetary bail conditions. The circuit court dismissed the petition, finding Nichols had an adequate remedy at law through remedial writs. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that the denial of a remedial writ without opinion does not constitute a decision on the merits and therefore does not provide an adequate remedy at law, entitling Nichols to seek a declaration of rights.