Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Crescent Plumbing Supply Company Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
crescent-plumbing-supply-company
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Crescent Plumbing Supply Company

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Crescent Plumbing Supply Company sought a refund of sales tax, which the Director of Revenue and the Administrative Hearing Commission denied as untimely. Crescent argued its refund request was timely under a regulation that allowed filing within three years of the tax return's due date, contending its transactions constituted a single sale. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the AHC's decision, holding that the three-year refund period runs from the date of overpayment, which is when the tax was remitted, and that the transactions were separate sales under the sales tax code.