Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Cristina Raybourn Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
cristina-raybourn
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Cristina Raybourn

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

Cristina Raybourn vs. Changing Leads Equine Rescue; Woodson Hill Equestrian Center, LLC

Appellant

Cristina Raybourn, a volunteer, sued Changing Leads Equine Rescue and Woodson Hill Equestrian Center after being kicked by a horse and sustaining significant injuries. The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendants, concluding that Raybourn's claims were barred by liability waivers and the Equine Liability Act. The appellate court affirmed, holding that Raybourn's volunteer activities constituted "equine activities" and her injuries arose from inherent risks covered by the Equine Liability Act, thus shielding the defendants from liability.