Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Dana L. Girgis Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
dana-l-girgis
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Dana L. Girgis

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Oct 24, 2023

Dana L. Girgis, Respondent, v. Mark S. Girgis, Appellant.

Respondent

Mark Girgis (Father) appealed the circuit court's judgment modifying his child support payments to Dana Girgis (Mother). The appellate court found the circuit court erred in its Form 14 calculation regarding the number of nights the children spend with Father, which impacted the visitation credit. Consequently, the court reversed that portion of the judgment and modified Father's child support obligation. The judgment was affirmed in all other respects, including the calculation of Father's income and Mother's health insurance costs, the latter being unpreserved for appeal.