Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Dave Wensel and Mike Wensel, Defendants, and Bank of Old Monroe Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
dave-wensel-and-mike-wensel-defendants-and-bank-of-old-monroe
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Dave Wensel and Mike Wensel, Defendants, and Bank of Old Monroe

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Laura Kelly-Patel appealed the trial court's judgment setting aside a default judgment she obtained against Bank of Old Monroe in a garnishment proceeding. The trial court had vacated the default judgment for "good cause shown." The appellate court reversed, holding that the Bank failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 74.05(d) because its motion to set aside the default judgment was unverified, unsupported by evidence, and contained only conclusory statements. The court also addressed and denied the Bank's motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of a final, appealable judgment.