This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
Party ID
david-j-escalona
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Need help turning court research into a case plan?
If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.
David Escalona appealed the motion court's judgment dismissing his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion for failure to appear. The motion court dismissed the motion without issuing findings of fact and conclusions of law, asserting they were not required. The appellate court reversed the judgment and remanded the case, holding that Rule 29.15(j) unambiguously requires findings of fact and conclusions of law on all issues presented, regardless of whether a hearing is held or the movant is present, to allow for meaningful appellate review.