Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

DAVID ROMANO, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
david-romano-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving DAVID ROMANO, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Jun 4, 2024

DAVID ROMANO, et al., Respondents v. MIKE R. & CARLA ADAMS, et al., Appellants

Respondent

Landowners Mike R. & Carla Adams appealed a circuit court judgment declaring Canyon Road and an adjacent Access Area public by common law dedication and prescriptive easement, after they erected a gate blocking public access. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's findings, concluding there was substantial evidence to support the common law dedication and prescriptive easement for both the road and the access area. The court also found the easement descriptions sufficiently definite and upheld the trial court's amendment of pleadings to conform to evidence regarding a specific gravel bar. The judgment ensures continued public access to the Finley River via Canyon Road.