Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Dawn Warren-Cook Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
dawn-warrencook
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Dawn Warren-Cook

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Dawn Warren-Cook sued her former employers, Ernie Rhodes and Todd Farley, alleging whistleblower violations under section 105.055. A jury found in her favor, and the trial court awarded compensatory damages and attorney's fees, applying a 1.5 multiplier to the lodestar amount. Rhodes and Farley appealed, challenging only the application of the multiplier. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision regarding the multiplier, dismissed the Missouri Department of Public Safety as a party, and remanded the case for the sole purpose of determining Warren-Cook's reasonable attorney's fees and costs on appeal.