Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

DI Supply I, LLC and its Individual Members Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
di-supply-i-llc-and-its-individual-members
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving DI Supply I, LLC and its Individual Members

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

DI Supply I, LLC, which sells room furnishings to Drury Hotels, challenged a sales tax assessment, contending that its sales were exempt under the resale exemption because the hotels effectively resold the furnishings to guests. The Administrative Hearing Commission upheld the assessment. On review, the Missouri Supreme Court affirmed, clarifying that the sales tax resale exemption requires a transfer of title or ownership, not just the right to use, store, or consume the property. The Court concluded that prior jurisprudence had mistakenly applied use tax definitions to sales tax cases, and DI Supply failed to demonstrate a transfer of ownership to hotel guests.