Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Dimetrious Woods Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
dimetrious-woods
Cases Shown
3
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Cases Involving Dimetrious Woods

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Dimetrious Woods, convicted of drug trafficking, sought a declaratory judgment against the Missouri Department of Corrections, arguing that the repeal of section 195.295, RSMo, rendered him eligible for parole. The circuit court sustained Woods's motion for judgment on the pleadings, leading to his parole. The Missouri Supreme Court reversed, holding that the repeal of section 195.295 had no effect on Woods's parole ineligibility, consistent with its concurrently decided case, Mitchell v. Jones.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jan 8, 2019

Dimetrious Woods vs. Missouri Department of Corrections

Appellant

Dimetrious Woods sought a declaratory judgment against the Missouri Department of Corrections, arguing that a repealed statute eliminating parole ineligibility for prior drug offenders applied retroactively to his sentence for drug trafficking. The circuit court granted Woods's motion, but the appellate court reversed, holding that the repealed statute was part of the substantive law governing Woods's offense and therefore did not apply retroactively under section 1.160. Given the importance and recurring nature of the issue, the appellate court transferred the case to the Missouri Supreme Court.