Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Director of Revenue, Respondent- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
director-of-revenue-respondent
Cases Shown
31
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Cases Involving Director of Revenue, Respondent-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

James William Gamblin's driving privileges were revoked by the Director of Revenue for refusing a chemical breath test. Gamblin appealed the circuit court's judgment upholding the revocation, arguing the arresting officer failed to allow him twenty minutes to contact an attorney after reading the Implied Consent law, and that he was prejudiced. The appellate court affirmed, holding that Gamblin had already consulted with his attorney and abandoned any further attempts to speak with one, thus satisfying the statutory requirement.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / May 19, 2023

CHRIS WOOD, Petitioner-Respondent v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant

Appellant

The Director for the Missouri Department of Revenue appealed a judgment reinstating Chris Wood's driver's license after he refused a chemical test following an arrest by a federal park ranger. The trial court found the federal ranger lacked authority under Missouri's Implied Consent law. The appellate court vacated the judgment, holding that federal park rangers are "arresting officers" under Missouri's Implied Consent law and that license revocation can proceed based on federal citations. The case was remanded for the trial court to make specific factual findings and enter a new judgment.