Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

DONALD WAYNE MCMANNIS, Defendant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
donald-wayne-mcmannis-defendant
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving DONALD WAYNE MCMANNIS, Defendant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Jan 27, 2021

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent vs. DONALD WAYNE MCMANNIS, Defendant-Appellant

Appellant

Donald Wayne McMannis appealed his felony driving while intoxicated (DWI) conviction, arguing there was insufficient evidence to prove he was intoxicated at the time he was driving. He contended there was a time lapse between when he was seen driving and when he was observed to be intoxicated, suggesting he might have become intoxicated later. The Southern District affirmed the conviction, finding that a reasonable inference could be drawn that McMannis was intoxicated while driving, as there was no significant time lapse and the officer smelled alcohol and observed signs of intoxication shortly after seeing him drive.