Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Donte McGary Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
donte-mcgary
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Donte McGary

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Mar 28, 2023

Donte McGary, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Appellant

Donte McGary appealed the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, which he filed after pleading guilty to murder and assault. His court-appointed counsel filed an amended motion beyond the statutory deadline, but the motion court denied relief without first conducting an inquiry into whether counsel had abandoned McGary. The appellate court reversed and remanded the case, holding that the motion court's failure to conduct the mandatory abandonment inquiry was reversible error, thus precluding a review of the merits of McGary's claims.