Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Dustin Demont Brown Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
dustin-demont-brown
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Dustin Demont Brown

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jun 28, 2019

State of Missouri vs. Dustin Demont Brown

Respondent

Dustin Demont Brown appealed his conviction for third-degree assault, arguing the trial court erred by allowing the State to read a statute and appellate cases on resisting arrest during closing arguments. The appellate court agreed that the trial court abused its discretion by permitting the State to instruct the jury on the law using external sources. However, the court affirmed Brown's conviction, finding that this error did not prejudice the assault charge because the resisting arrest and assault charges were factually distinct and had different verdict directors.