Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Dustin Matthews Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
dustin-matthews
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Dustin Matthews

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

John Marcus Sommers vs. Dustin Matthews

Respondent

John Marcus Sommers sued Dustin Matthews for breach of contract and fraud related to an unpaid loan. The trial court struck Matthews's answer and affirmative defenses as a discovery sanction, but later entered judgment for Matthews, relying on the statute of frauds defense. The Western District of the Missouri Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the trial court erred by basing its judgment on an affirmative defense that had been stricken from the pleadings and was therefore waived. The case was remanded for the trial court to enter judgment for Sommers on damages consistent with the admitted allegations.