Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Edgar Forshe Bozarth Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
edgar-forshe-bozarth
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Edgar Forshe Bozarth

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jul 5, 2022

Joyce Elaine Bozarth vs. Edgar Forshe Bozarth

Respondent

Joyce Bozarth (Wife) appealed the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Edgar Bozarth (Husband) and an award of attorney's fees to Husband. The dispute centered on the interpretation of a separation agreement regarding the "sale or liquidation" of marital business entities and the division of proceeds. The appellate court reversed the trial court's judgment, holding that Husband's sale of all real property assets of the marital entities constituted a liquidation under the agreement, triggering his obligation to share proceeds with Wife. The case was remanded for entry of judgment in Wife's favor, calculation of her damages, and reasonable attorney's fees and costs.