Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Edward J. Crowell and Patricia A. Crowell Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
edward-j-crowell-and-patricia-a-crowell
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Edward J. Crowell and Patricia A. Crowell

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Edward J. and Patricia A. Crowell appealed a Platte County Circuit Court judgment that affirmed a decision by the Missouri State Tax Commission. The Commission had rejected the Crowells' claim that the 2015 assessment of their property was discriminatory. The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's judgment, finding the Commission's decision was based on substantial evidence and was not arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, or unlawful. The court held that the Crowells lacked standing to challenge the 2008 assessment and failed to present sufficient evidence to prove their discrimination claim for the 2015 assessment.