Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Eric Baker and Veronica Baker Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
eric-baker-and-veronica-baker
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Eric Baker and Veronica Baker

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Melissa K. Espinosa, as trustee, sued Eric and Veronica Baker for unlawful detainer after they failed to vacate premises following the mutual termination of their lease due to a mold infestation. The trial court awarded Espinosa possession, statutory double damages, physical damages, and attorney fees. On appeal, the Bakers challenged the classification of their tenancy and attempted to raise a warranty of habitability claim. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that the Bakers were holdover tenants and that a warranty of habitability claim is outside the scope of an unlawful detainer action. The court also denied Espinosa's motion for attorney fees on appeal.