Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Ferrellgas, Inc., and Aravind Sreedharan and Sue Hasty Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
ferrellgas-inc-and-aravind-sreedharan-and-sue-hasty
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Ferrellgas, Inc., and Aravind Sreedharan and Sue Hasty

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Aug 18, 2020

Floyd Steven Wiedner vs. Ferrellgas, Inc., and Aravind Sreedharan and Sue Hasty

Respondent

Floyd Wiedner sued Ferrellgas, Inc., and two individual supervisors, Aravind Sreedharan and Sue Hasty, alleging discrimination and retaliation under the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA). The circuit court dismissed the claims against the individuals for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and later dismissed the claim against Ferrellgas, Inc. with prejudice. The appellate court reversed both dismissals, holding that the 2017 MHRA amendment regarding individual liability was substantive and not retroactive, and that the fact-intensive 'substantial identity of interests' test could not be applied on a motion to dismiss. The court also found that Wiedner's amended petition against Ferrellgas, Inc. related back to the original filing date, preserving its claims.