Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Ferrellgas, Inc., et al Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
ferrellgas-inc-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Ferrellgas, Inc., et al

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Mar 28, 2023

Floyd S. Wiedner vs. Ferrellgas, Inc., et al

Respondent

Floyd Steven Wiedner sued his former employer, Ferrellgas, Inc., alleging violations of the Missouri Human Rights Act. After an arbitrator awarded Wiedner damages and attorney's fees, he moved the trial court to partially vacate the award, arguing the arbitrator improperly reduced his requested attorney's fees and denied pre- and post-judgment interest. The appellate court affirmed the denial of Wiedner's motion to vacate the attorney's fee award, finding the arbitrator acted within discretion. However, the court reversed the denial of post-judgment interest, remanding for the trial court to modify its judgment to include it.