Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Frederic Pratter Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
frederic-pratter
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Car Accidents
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Frederic Pratter

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / May 28, 2019

Denise Kappel and William Kappel, Appellants, vs. Frederic Pratter, Respondent.

Respondent

Denise Kappel sued Frederic Prater for negligence following a motor vehicle accident, with William Kappel joining for loss of consortium. The jury found Prater liable but awarded Mrs. Kappel reduced damages. On appeal, the Kappels argued the trial court erred by admitting irrelevant and prejudicial photographs of Mrs. Kappel's vehicle. The appellate court affirmed the finding of liability but reversed the damages award, remanding for a new trial solely on damages, finding the photographs were improperly admitted and influenced the jury's award.